Stop Provoking Your Children to Anger

Share this post via email










Submit

I've been thinking about Ephesians 6:4 lately. I poked around for a few commentaries and found this page to have some interesting stuff. It looks like Paul uses the present imperative, so the passage could be rendered "stop provoking your children to anger."

Way back in the day as a surrogate father, I found I focused heavily on the "children obey your parents" verse. But I skipped the one about not exasperating my children.

Now that school is gearing up again, many of my college-aged friends are more acutely experiencing the pain and frustration of this time of transition. So are their parents, it seems. The transition toward independence in college was a rough stretch for me, even with my great parents. And some of my friends are entering this period without the close bond I had as a homeschooled kid. While I do encourage these kids to honor their parents, their parents are absolutely exasperating!

So, question: Do you think it's easier for you not to exasperate your children because you know them so well as a homeschool parent? How do you apply this verse and take it to heart?

Come to think of it, I've been around church long enough to hear a few sermons and lessons about obeying/honoring parents. I haven't heard as many on not provoking children to anger and discouragement. In my observation, it isn't that hard to say or do something that causes your kid to lose heart. I'm not even a parent and I've said things that discouraged kids around me. This, like the verses before it, is probably something I need to meditate on more than I do...

Do you have any insights into the admonition to not exasperate but rather instruct in the Lord?

 ~Luke Holzmann
Filmmaker, Writer, Empty Nester

Share this post via email










Submit
Tagged , , , , , | 3 Comments

Why You Are an Expert by Kindergarten

Share this post via email










Submit

Malcolm Gladwell's Outliers makes a strong case for needing 10,000 hours of practice before you become great at anything. That's a lot of time, but not that much. A prominent educator recently shared that it took him about five years to really become a fantastic teacher. My mother-in-law saw the connection first; that's 10,000 hours!

If you ever had a substitute/part time/volunteer teacher, you may relate to the frustration of this fictional kid (thanks, Mrs. C). There's something about experts that make them more effective. Gladwell argues that it's, in large part, the 10,000 hours--or five years of full-time practice--they have under their belt.

Five years?

What struck me is that five years is about when kids enter Kindergarten (some of us start a bit later, other children get going earlier). So that means that right around the time you're becoming an expert in your kid, many families farm them out to another institution where the "real experts" can take over. And there absolutely are some phenomenal teachers out there. But as my little sister recently pointed out: When you choose to keep kids around, they aren't an inconvenience. And though there's always more to learn, you've invested far more than 10,000 hours in your child.

You're an expert.

"But I haven't been teaching for fives years," you may counter.

That's not entirely true. Your children can probably do a great many things you taught them to do: Eat with utensils, tie shoes, walk, talk, enjoy picture books, recognize a few colors (I still have trouble with some of these... chartreuse?), and more. So, sure, you may not have 10,000 hours teaching math yet, but that's coming.

You are an expert. And the more you do this, the better you'll get.

So... get to it! Still considering your homeschooling curriculum options?

Check out Sonlight. <smile>

 ~Luke Holzmann
Filmmaker, Writer, Empty Nester

P.S. Reminder: The Rosetta Stone sale ends tomorrow.

Share this post via email










Submit
Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

Learning by Copying . . .

Share this post via email










Submit

I recently read a fascinating article in World Magazine's June 2nd publication (ok, so I'm a little behind on my reading). Titled the same as my blog entry, it talks about how professional artists gain valuable training by minicking the masters at the National Gallery of Art. Called "copyists", these artists regularly visit the gallery to study the great masters, and to learn their style and technique ... through *IMITATION*. One artist is quoted as saying, the key to becoming a great artist is learning great technique. What better way to learn than by imitating those who have mastered the technique.

Just as artists have been learning their craft in this fashion for many, many years ... so do young students learn to write well through the practice of "dictation". Dictation is simply the practice of imitating fine writing by copying passages from award-winning literature.

As simplistic as dictation might seem, it truly does improve a student's writing skills. Dictation also provides opportunity for a student to practice and improve their handwriting skills, as well as practicing proper grammar and good sentence structure. So much packed into the simple task of copywork and/or dictation!

Instead of producing writing "clones", or students who merely mimic the style of other authors, dictation gives students the foundation to launch from in creating their own style.  It makes them so familiar with the fundamental building blocks of writing, that they are then free to focus wherever their creativity takes them.

As quoted in the World article I referenced above, By copying you will eventually acquire a style individual to yourself, and it cannot help being good because your hand and mind, being always accustomed to gather flowers, would ill know how to pick thorns.

Still on the journey . . .
~Judy Wnuk
Sonlight Customer Champion

 

 

 

Share this post via email










Submit
Tagged , | Leave a comment

School Question

Share this post via email










Submit

Natalia went to a backyard Bible club hosted by a family in our church. She wanted to try out a group with older children and I figured, why not? She loves people and easily makes friends. Although she's not quite 4 she speaks very clearly and understands almost everything (often more than I realize!) going on around her.

The group ended up being much older. As I had guessed, Natalia wasn't fazed and she participated well, answered questions, asked questions, raised her hand and commented on the stories. She had a great time. But I didn't. I saw several instances of just mean from the older kids. From laughing at a little boy, to scoffing at Natalia when she would ask her questions. My hackles raised. It brought back my main memory from high school: people being mean when they don't even know you. They have no reason to be mean. They just are.

I went home disturbed. I didn't want Natalia to return. I really want to keep the day when she discovers mean people a long way down the line. I told Dave about it, and the question just popped out, "Why would any Christian parent not homeschool their kids? Why would they expose them to this?"

I'm not trying to sound condescending at all. I just really don't understand.*

A few thoughts to counteract things I've heard in the past:


Natalia in the Sand

I need a break from my kids.
Something I realized while on vacation with Dave's family, having a Gramby, a Pap pap, a Granny, two aunts and an uncle around to hold the girls (at this point the only grandchildren), play with them, feed them, etc. really changed my attitude. For the worse. When I have a lot of time for me, when I'm able to just do my own thing, and then am suddenly called back to motherhood, I feel like I'm being inconvenienced. "Argh, really, you need something? I was just about to..."

Normally, I'm used to having two additional shadows. When we are at home, or with just Dave and I caring for them, it's no inconvenience. They are no inconvenience. It's life. It's what I chose and I love it. I love helping and caring and being needed. It's interesting how a week can change that. I wonder if moms would like their kids more if they were around them more?

I'm afraid my kid won't know how to interact and be socialized.
Natalia loves people. She is obviously an extrovert. But after church and lunch with people on Sunday, maybe the pool or the park on Monday, ballet on Tuesday, Bible study Wednesday, another pool or park day on Thursday, grocery shopping Friday, and then time with dad on Saturday and maybe more errands, she really has had an awful lot of interactions with people throughout the course of the week. Sometimes she just wants to stay home but I want to go to the park or the pool this mamma (and extrovert) guiltily admits. She is learning how to interact with people. She sees a lot of people. She also enjoys downtime.

I'm afraid my kid won't learn well at home.
With this one, I just look at myself and say, I'm of a pretty normal intelligence and I did great. If you look at test scores homeschoolers come out just fine on all counts...so, if we can just get past our insecurities we'll be okay, right?

What are your thoughts? What, for you, is the reason you say, I won't send me kids to school? What would change your mind? What reason might you say, I really think they'd be better elsewhere?

Until next time,
Jonelle

*I get that there are always reasons for people to be outside the sweeping generality I just made. Please know that I recognize that it's a sweeping generality, but that I still am curious to know the answer. I do understand that some people have to work, others might be too ill or their children are, and that it is additional money out of pocket...I still wonder though...

Share this post via email










Submit
Tagged , , , , , | 10 Comments

When Not to Socialize Your Kids

Share this post via email










Submit

She's in college now. An art major with a solidifying style and a keen wit. She's getting better, she tells me, at speaking her mind. In high school, she was a coward who kept her mouth shut to stay in proximity to the popular kids.

For more than twenty minutes, she recounts tales of woe and despicable behavior that played out around her as a teen in school. At the center of this imploding mess was an Alpha girl and a wannabe. Those two, it seems, were the catalyst and trigger for a swath of atrocities. But she was too insecure to do anything. She didn't even dare leave the circle of dysfunction.

"I envy you your homeschooling," she announces. "I wouldn't have thought I was stupid." A moment. Then, "I'm not stupid."

Each time she is reminded of this fact, the opposite message she learned in school fades just a little bit. A self-proclaimed nerd, she finds much comfort in the words of Paul Graham. She's not stupid. The kids were simply mean and the system so inflexible that it couldn't accommodate her strengths and help her overcome her weaknesses.

People critical of homeschooling tend to talk of socialization in the teen years as if it is something homeschoolers lack. The more I talk with kids who survived this period of time, the more I'm prone to think the opposite is true. Skipping this "cruel and stupid world" may actually be a very good thing. This young lady didn't learn how to deal with bullies. She's learned--and is learning--since high school ... not because of it.

So when should you not socialize your kids? When you'd rather lay a foundation and spare them from the nastiness of a society run by insecure children who have little purpose in the world they are forced to inhabit.

What other reasons have you discovered that keep you from "socializing" your kids?

 ~Luke Holzmann
Filmmaker, Writer, Empty Nester

P.S. The irony, of course, is that those of us who stayed home for some of these years were likely far better socialized for it because we were in a real world with adults.

Share this post via email










Submit
Tagged , , | 3 Comments

Thinking Bigger in Ministry

Share this post via email










Submit

My perspective is often far too narrow. Take, for example, the following that literally just happened:

A friend called needing me to bring him a spare key after locking himself out of his house. Happy to be of service, I dropped everything at work to come to his aid. What a good friend I am, right?

Right.

Except every red light stopped me from rescuing my friend. Every bad driver left him stranded a moment longer. The streams of cars blocking my turn held me back. And that made me upset. In a wide variety of creative expressions I muttered and mumbled against these barriers to my good deed. "Get out of my way!" I said in many an ungracious manner.


Red Light

A gentle nudge forced me to pause in my ranting. The thought floated to my conscience: 'In your desire to help your friend, you've forgotten that every vehicle contains a least one other soul, Luke. They likely need grace and compassion and help as well.'

"But they're not my friend," I grumbled. And in that betrayed my veneer of selflessness. That passage from Matthew 5 seems appropriate: I was caring for my friend but no one else... which is something everyone does. I'm a fine friend, sure, but I want to be more than that. I want to be someone who loves and blesses everyone around me. I want to share the love of Christ with everyone.

I read once that the reason we get road rage when someone cuts us off in a car but not while walking is due to a lack of feedback. When it's an impersonal car, we get mad at it and the person controlling the thing. When a person almost trips us accidentally, we exchange a brief apology in a glance. That makes them human and so we are quicker to forgive.

It's fascinating and terrible how easily I convert people into blockades. A similar thing can happen when the person isn't in my group. Like homeschooling. It's so easy for me to put non-homeschoolers in a group I can dismiss. I don't mean to do this. I think homeschooling a great option, but it's just one of many totally viable options. Parents who purposely choose the educational pathway that fits their family and children should not be put in a box of "oh, Thems" like in Gammage Cup.

May we continue to think bigger about ministry. May we, like our Sonlight curriculum encourages us, gain a global perspective that gets our focus off ourselves and out to the world around us. I talk about this a bit in the Christlike Thinking podcast I was a part of recently, if you haven't had a chance to listen to it yet.

Enjoy your weekend, and may God's grace flow from you to everyone around you.

 ~Luke Holzmann
Filmmaker, Writer, Empty Nester

Share this post via email










Submit
Tagged , , | Leave a comment

The Catalyst for Learning

Share this post via email










Submit

Cherish, one of my bloggy friends, suggested I read her post on instructional technologies. The title hadn't grabbed my attention while zipping through my RSS feeds this morning, so I'm glad she encouraged me to check it out. I'm still processing all the information in the post, but the first thing to hit me was the research that shows lectures aren't a very effective way to teach. Yet educators and professors across the country continue to stand in front of the class in an attempt to impart knowledge to their charges.

Check one for homeschooling. It's not often we engage in a lecture. Reprimanding a child... that's different, and yet, possibly, equally ineffective <smile>.

That's not to say formal education itself is pointless. Rather, the methods and tools we utilize can be more or less beneficial. Which brought me back to a discussion I had the other night after watching Waiting for Superman. There are far more factors involved in the success of certain charter schools than simply a lack of unions and poor teachers. In fact, thinking about the statistics, the deciding factors are likely the parents and the home life of these students. The perspective that getting a better lecture will redirect your life appears is blindingly short-sighted.

And yet, the environment and methodology of teaching can have a profound impact on a student's desire to learn and grow. I can name the high school and college classes I took which drained my will to learn faster than a toilet flushes water. And then it hit me: Learning opportunities--like classes, lectures, books, online videos, articles, discussion, or curricula--are the catalyst for learning rather than the mechanism. As many have said before, the best learning opportunities give you a thirst for knowledge. You are the one who does the learning.

I'm personally very excited about online learning opportunities--considering I just finished creating one. The ability to find lessons on just about any topic you can imagine is thrilling. The classroom of the future is being molded today. And I'm looking forward to seeing where we end up.

One last point: Great literature is still one of the most powerful ways to learn. It allows us to wrestle with big ideas and discover worlds and interests outside our own. So if you're looking for a non-lecture-based, literature-rich homeschool curriculum, Sonlight's a great option.

 ~Luke Holzmann
Filmmaker, Writer, Empty Nester

P.S. I had an opportunity to be a guest on the Christlike Thinking podcast. Listening to myself, I say "umm" a lot <sigh>. But toward the end, after I got on a roll, I did a bit better. We covered some interesting stuff. You can download the .mp3 here: http://www.brucesabin.com/podcast/Luke_Holzmann.mp3

Share this post via email










Submit
Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments